Instituciones, cambio institucional y crecimiento económico: una revisión crítica del enfoque neoclásico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i8.1129Palabras clave:
Crecimiento económico, Instituciones, Cambio institucionalResumen
Este trabajo explora críticamente la relación entre instituciones y crecimiento económico en el marco de la teoría neoclásica. Se revisa la hipótesis de crecimiento económico basado en el sistema de derechos de propiedad, y se describen los principales problemas conceptuales y empíricos y las consecuencias que se desprenden de esta visión, en cuanto al diseño e implementación de políticas públicas. Finalmente, se estudia el debate sobre cambio institucional, comparando las dificultades de diversos enfoques para generar una explicación acerca de las causas que motivan cambios permanentes en la trayectoria de crecimiento económico de un país.Descargas
Referencias
Acemoglu, D. y Robinson, J. A. (2000). Why did the West Extend the Franchise? Democracy , Inequality and Growth in Historical Perspective. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (2), 1167–1200.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. y Robinson, J. A. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. The American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. y Robinson, J. A. (2002). Reversal of Fortune: Georgraphy and Institutions in the Making of the Moden World Income Distribution. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1231–1294.
Banerjee, A. e Iyer, L. (2002). ''History, Institutions and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India''. Tesis de Máster en Economía, Department of Economics, MIT.
Bardhan, P. (2004). ''History, Institutions and Underdevelopment''. Tesis de Máster en Economía, Department of Economics, University of California.
Basu, K. (1983). On Why We Do Not Try To Walk Off Without Paying After a Taxi–Ride. Economic and Political Weekly, 48, 2011–2012.
Beck, T. G., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P. y Walsh, P. (2002). New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. Regulation and Competition Policy. Washington, D.C.: Development Research Group, World Bank.
Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions. The Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (1), 75–111.
Chang, H– J. (2006). ''Understanding the Relationship between Institutions and Economic Development. Some Key Theoretical Issues'', UNU Wider Discussion Paper No. 2006/05, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez–de–Silanes, F. y Shleifer, A. (2002). The Regulation of Entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1), 1–37.
Dollar, D. y Kray, A. (2002). ''Institutions, Trade, and Growth'', paper presentado en la Carnegie– Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy.
Easterly, W. y Levine, R. (2002). ''Tropics, Germs, Crops: How Endowments Influence Economic Development'', Working Paper 9106, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
Ellerman, D. (1999). Helping Others to Help Themselves: The Challenge of Autonomy – Compatible Development Assistance, Mimeo, Washington D.C.
Elster, J. (1985). Making Sense of Marx, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Etzioni, A. (1988). The Moral Dimension, New York, USA: The Free Press.
Frey, B. (1997). Not Just for the Money – An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
Galor, O. y Moav, O. (2001). ''Das Human Kapital'', CEPR Discussion Paper Series No. 2701. Obtenido en: http://www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP2701.
Hafer, C. (2003). ''On the Origins of Property Rights: Conflict and Production in the State of Nature'', Working Paper, Department of Politics, New York University.
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.
Kindleberger, C. (1952). Review of The Economy of Turkey; The Economic Development of Guatemala; Report on Cuba. Review of Economics and Statistics, 34 (4), 391–392.
Knack, S. y Keefer, P. (1995). ''Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross– Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Indicators'', MPRA Paper 23118, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Krugman, P. (1991). History versus Expectations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 651–667.
Kuisel, R. (1981). Capitalism and the State in Modern France. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press,.
Levine, R. y Renelt, D. (1992). A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross–Country Growth Regressions. American Economic Review, 82 (4), 942–63.
Lindert, P. H. (2004). Explaining the Rise of Mass Public Schooling. En P. H. Lindert (Ed.) Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 240–314.
Marx, K. (1993). El Capital (3 vols.). Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 681–712.
Mill, J. S. (1991). Considerations on Representative Government. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A. y Vishny, R. W. (1989). Why is rent seeking so costly to growth? The American Economic Review, 83, 409–414.
North, D. C. (1980). Structure and Change in Economic History, New York, USA: .W. Norton.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, A. (2004a). The Last Instance: Are Institutions the Primary Cause of Economic Development? European Journal of Sociology, 45(2), 165–188.
Przeworski, A. (2004b). Some Historical, Theoretical, and Methodological Issues in Identifying Effects of Political Institutions, unpublished, New York, USA: New York University.
Rodrik, D. (1999). ''Institutions for High Quality Growth: What They Are and How They Affect Growth'', paper presentado en la International Monetary Fund Conference on Second–Generation Reforms, Washington, D.C.
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. y Trebbi, F. (2002). ''Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Integration and Geography in Economic Development'', IMF Working Paper, WP/02/189, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.
Rodrik, D. (2004). Getting Institutions Right. Chicago, USA: Mimeo.
Rosenstein–Rodan, P. N. (1943). Problems of Industrialization of Eastern and South–Eastern Europe. Economic Journal, 53, 210–211.
Sachs, J. (2003). ''Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income'', NBER Working Paper, No. 9490, February.
Simon, H. (1983). Reasons in Human Behaviour. Oxford, USA: Blackwell.
Sindzingre, A. N. (2003). Institutions and Development: a Theoretical Contribution, Cambridge: Mimeo.
Stigler, G. (1975). The Citizen and the State: Essays on Regulation. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1999). ''Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? Corporate Governance Failures in the Transition'', Paris, Francia: CAE and the World Bank, Annual World Bank Conference in Development Economics.
Tanzi, V. (2000). ''The Role of the State and the Quality of the Public Sector'', Working Paper WP/00/36, International Monetary Fund, Washington D. C.
Van Arkadie, B. (1990). ''The Role of Institutions in Development in the World Bank'', Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, Washington D.C.
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. The Journal of Economic Literature, 38 (3), 595–613.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2011 Cecilia Bermúdez
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
© Derechos reservados de autor
El material de esta publicación puede ser reproducido sin autorización, siempre y cuando se cite el título, el autor y la fuente institucional.
El contenido publicado en Revista CS se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 Atribución/Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Usted es libre de:
Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material.
Bajo los siguientes términos:
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.