La decisión de cumplir con el acuerdo nuclear civil entre Estados Unidos y la India. Los factores que conducen al cumplimiento por parte del Estado
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i14.1846Palabras clave:
Acuerdo 123 India-U.S., Cumplimiento, Asociación estratégica, Seguridad energética, Comercio nuclearResumen
El cumplimiento del Estado con los compromisos internacionales no siempre es parejo; es posible sesgar la apreciación de qué países van a cumplirlos y cuáles no, y en qué medida. Algunos estudiosos suponen que los EE.UU. cumplirán el Acuerdo nuclear civil 123, firmado con la India y cuyo principal objetivo es suministrar combustible nuclear a éste país. Existe también la percepción de que la India no cumplirá con sus compromisos respectivos, como por ejemplo, en lo que se refiere a mantener las medidas de salvaguardia en sus instalaciones nucleares. Mediante el análisis de un instrumento no vinculante negociado entre dos actores asimétricos, el presente estudio contribuye a un mejor entendimiento de los factores que afectan el cumplimiento de los acuerdos firmados en el ámbito del comercio nuclear. Sobre la base de las teorías de cumplimiento de Peter Haas, analizo la presencia/relevancia de los factores institucionales e ideológicos internacionales que en combinación con la política y las estructuras nacionales pueden influir en la decisión del actor a cumplir. Me parece que podemos esperar que la India cumpla más plenamente con las disposiciones del tratado que los EE.UU; dependiendo de la intervención de ciertos factores institucionales o ideológicos, los EE.UU., no podría o no estaría dispuesto a cumplir. Su voluntad de cumplir podría verse afectada, entre otras cosas por importantes actores nacionales interesados en la aplicación de la Ley de Hyde, como se evidencia en el proceso de ratificación. Por lo tanto, en contra de la opinión dominante, el Acuerdo 123 no le permite a la India lograr la seguridad energética ni termina con treinta y cuatro años de aislamiento nuclear.
Descargas
Referencias
Ashley, T. (2006, June), Atoms for War? U.S.-Indian Civilian Nuclear Cooperation and India’s Nuclear Arsenal. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/NvvvMH
Australia not to sell uranium to India till it signs NPT. (2008, September 8). The Economic Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/AxLPLN
Baruah, A. (2008, August 1). Vienna won, next halt N-club. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from: http://www.hindustantimes.com/storypage/Print
Baruah, A. (2008, September 5). Austria stands between India and N-power. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/2oD3WU
Baruah, A. (2008, September 7) A word with China just before NSG waiver. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/mkCA0B
Baruah, A. (2008, September 8). Life after NSG. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from: http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage
Berman, H. (2008, August 5). Letter from Congressman Howard Berman to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on the U.S. Indian Nuclear Deal, Letter. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/HejUnx
Bhanu Mehta, P (2006, March 7). Nuclear pact launches India into uncharted waters. Yale Global, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/vlzRA5
BJP demands resignation of UPA govt on nuclear deal issue. (2008, September 4). Economic Times. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/i4G5tk
BJP rakes up nuclear issue, says deal does not permit tests. (2008, August 1). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/sB4CNL
Boeing. (2006, January 11). Boeing, Air India Formally Announce Order Agreement for 68 Jets. Boeing Website, Press Release. Retrieved from: http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/
Buffett’s constellation deal said to worry nuclear firms. (2008, September 28). The New York Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/lMB4o1
Burns, R. N. (2007). America’s Strategic Opportunity with India. The New U.S.-India Partnership.” Foreign Affairs 86(6). Retrieved from: http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20071101faessay86609/r-nicholas-burns/america-s-strategic-opportunity-with-india.html
Bush says N-supply not legally binding; India worried. (2008, September 12). The Times of India, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/kgbrta
Buy French reactor & get lifetime fuel. (2008, September 19). The Economic Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/c7dCKy
Chomsky, N., Klein, N., Zinn, H., Benjamin, M., LeBlanc, J., Davis, M., Bellamy Foster, J., & Prashad, V. (2007, September 3). Why we oppose the Indo-U.S. military ties. The Hindu : Opinion / News Analysis. Retrieved from: http://www.thehindu.com/2007/09/03/stories/2007090355521100.htm
Correljé, A. & van der Linde, C. (2006). Energy supply security and geopolitics: A European perspective, Energy Policy 34(5), 532-543.
Deal done, now for the deals. (2008, September 9). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/ctRuyA
Dikshit , S. (2008, July 19). Three top scientists caution on deal. The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/wqjYW0
Dixit, J. N.. India’s foreign policy 1947-2003. New Delhi: Picus Book.
Dutt, V. :(2007). India’s foreign policy since independence. New Delhi: National Book Trust.
Embassy of India in Washington DC. http://goo.gl/kqzO9P
Energy security or fuel poverty? (2008, August 26). The Economic Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/t6TqjJ
Experts express concern over nuclear deal with U.S. (2006, July 3). The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/LKxStF
Gahlaut, S (2005, August 31). U.S.-India nuclear deal will strengthen Nonproliferation.. PacNet. Hawaii: Pacific Forum CSIS, Retrieved from: http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/pac0537.pdf
Galluci, R. L. (2006, April 26) Testimony of Robert Galluci before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Pdf. Retrieved from: http://foreign.senate.gov/testimony/2006/GullucciTestimony060426.pdf
Ganguly, S. & Dinshaw, M. (2006). The Case for the U.S.-India Nuclear Agreement. World Policy Journal 23(2), 11-19.
GE exploring business opportunities in Indian civil N-power. (2008, September 21) Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/IkoViI
GE, Hitachi Forge Global Alliance In Nuclear Industry” (2007, June 4). General Electric. Website. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/isFmYD
Ghoshroy, S. (2006). The U.S.-India nuclear deal: Triumph of the business lobby. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for International Studies, Retrieved from: http://web.mit.edu/cis/pdf/Audit_09_14_Ghoshroy.pdf
Haas (2000). Choosing to comply: Theorizing from international relations and comparative politics. In D. Shelton (Ed.), Commitment and compliance: The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system (pp. 43-64). Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA.
Heinrich, M. (2008, September 3). Nuclear states mull U.S.-India deal again as clock ticks. News. Reuters, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/OW1yeg
Heinzelman, K. (2008). Towards common interest and responsibilities. The Yale Journal of International Law 33(2), Retrieved from: http://www.yale.edu/yjil/
Hibbs, M. (2008, March 13). NSG drafting exemption conditions anticipating India-IAEA agreement Nucleonics Week
Holmes, Kim R. “The U.S. and India: Partnership for the 21st Century,” February 26, 2007. http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/hl998.cfm
Horner, D. Release of U.S.-India text does not quell controversy over US rights.. Nuclear Fuels 32(17)
IAEA Board of Governors. (2008, July 9). The conclusion of Safeguards Agreements and Additional Protocols. An agreement with the Government of India for the Application of Safeguards to Civilian Nuclear Facilities. Nuclear Verification, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/17H6b5
IAEA. What we do. HTML. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/uKdlT3
IEA. (2007). World Energy Outlook 2007: China and India insights. Paris: OECD/IEA, Retrieved from: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/2007.asp
India, Britain seeking closer ties. (2008, January 22). People’s Daily Online, Retrieved from: http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/90851/6342391.html
India n-deal may support 250,000 American jobs: US chamber. (2008, September 23). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/2CKbuZ
India, U.S. should look ahead: Jaswant. (2000, March 18). The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/bo26dD
Indian Americans ‘overjoyed’ with US House nod to N-deal. (2008, September 29). The Economic Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/JYUFbT
Iyengar , P.K. Controversy over the nuclear deal. (2007, May 31). The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/FGm688
Jansen, J. C., van Arkel, W. G., & Boots, M. G. (2004). Designing indicators of long-term energy supply security. Netherlands Environmental Assessment agency, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/lSq0nE
Kamdar, M. (2007, September, 30). Forget the Israel lobby. The Hill’s next big player is made in India. The Washington Post, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/E3ROyR
Kaul, A. (2008, September 28). France will launch civil n-coop with India: Sarkozy. Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/x3M3N8
Kellman, B (2000). Protection of Nuclear Materials. In D. Shelton (Ed.), Commitment and compliance: The role of non-binding norms in the international legal system, (pp. 487-504). Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA.
Kessler, G. (2008, September 2). In secret letter, Tough U.S. line on India nuclear deal” The Washington Post. Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/02/AR2008090202733.html.
Khare, H. (2008, September 30). France backs India’s quest for energy. The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://www.thehindu.com/2008/09/30/stories/2008093050440100.htm
Kimball, D. (2007). Henry J. Hyde United States / India peaceful atomic energy cooperation act of 2006 (P.L. 1090 - 401): Introductory note. International Legal Materials 46(2):1-30.
Kimball, D. & Meier, O. (2008, August 20). Conflict of interest shadows Germany in upcoming controversial India nuclear trade decision, report shows. Arms Control Association (ACA), Retrieved from: http://www.armscontrol.org/node/3291
Kimball, D. G., Ban, H., & Staples, S. (2008, August 15). Decision time on the Indian nuclear deal: help avert a nonproliferation disaster. Letter. Retrieved from: http://www.armscontrol.org/system/files/NSGLetterGermanyAug15.pdf .
Kimball, D. G.,& McGoldrick, F. (2007, August 3). U.S.-Indian nuclear agreement: A bad deal gets worse, Retrieved from: http://www.armscontrol.org/pressroom/2007/20070803_IndiaUS
Klug, F. (2008, September 3). US would stop nuke trade if India tests bomb” Guardian.
Koshy, N. (2006). Under the empire; India’s new foreign policy. Left Word Books.
Krishna, V. (2008, July 23). Deal-backers in US rejoice, plan ahead. Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=e31bcfe4-96f2-475d-84b1-cb61efda8edc
Lakshmi, R. (2008, September 2). A Secondary Role for U.S. in India’s Nuclear Future. The Washington Post, Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/01/AR2008090102728.html
Left Parties.(2008). Left stand on the nuclear deal. Notes exchanged in the UPA-Left Committee on India-US civil nuclear cooperation. New Delhi: Hari Singh Kang, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/ZXQXg9
Lockheed M. (2008). Asia Pacific/India. Website. Retrieved from: http://www.lockheedmartin.com/asia_pacific/india/index.html
Krepon, M. (2007, April 15). The nuclear flock. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Milestones in Indo-US N-deal. (2008, October 2). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/k7jGyq
Mohan, C. R. (2004). Crossing the rubicon: The shaping of India’s new foreign policy. Palgrave Macmillan
Mukherjee, K. (2008, September 8). India to sell nuclear deal to world, soothe critics. Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/OqJ2BA
Mukherjee, P . (2008, September 30). India and global challenges: Climate change and energy security. Asia Society, New York, Retrieved from: http://www.un.int/india/asia.pdf
Nalapat, M.D. (2008, September 9). China’s betrayal at the NSG. UPI Asia.com, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/wjvpQL
Narlikar, A.(2006). Peculiar chauvinism or strategic calculation? Explaining the negotiating strategy of a rising India. International Affairs 82(1), 59-76.
N Deal: ACA asks NSG to reject India-specific exemption draft. (2008, September 2). The Economic Times, Retrieved from: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/N_Deal_ACA_asks_NSG_to_reject_India-specific_exemption_draft/articleshow/3435211.cms
N-deal ‘ill-conceived’: NYT. (2008, September 30). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/mimnRD
N-deal with US ‘very favourable to India’: Washington Post.. (2007, July 29). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/xHpJnr
Neelesh, M. (2008, September 6). China says it backs India’s nuclear ambitions. Tibet Sun, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/OBYoFW
No rush, please. (2008, July 5). The New York Times, Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/05/opinion/05sat3.html?_r=1&scp=7&sq=Nuclear+deal&st=nyt&oref=slogin
NSG waiver: India issues demarche to China. (2008, September 7). The Times of India, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/V6oW1D
Office of the General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2002). Nuclear Regulatory Legislation. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1(6). Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/vxMdFI
Pachauri, R. K. (2004). The future of India’s economic growth: the natural resources and energy dimension. Futures 36(6-7), 703-713.
Pakistan voices concern over U.S.-India nuclear deal. (2007, August 3). People’s Daily Online, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/kYeIOV
Pant, H. V. A fine Balance: India walks a tightrope between Iran and the United States. (2007). Orbis a Journal of World Affairs 51( 3), 503-504.
Parthasarathi, A. (2008, March 17). The 123 doesn’t add u: Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/igloeY
Pereira, Neelam. “ India’s tryst with the N-Deal.” Current Science 95, no. 7 (October 2008): 821-822.
Perkovich, G. (2005). Faulty promises: The US-India Nuclear deal. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Powell, C. (2004). A strategy of partnerships. Foreign Affairs 83(1), Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/EX8Xx4
Response to Representative Tom Lantos’ letter of October 5 2007 concerning Congressional review of the U.S.-India Agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation. (2008 January 16), Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/UE7BKx
Rice, C. (2006, July 10). U.S.-India civil nuclear cooperation initiative. Inaugural meeting of the American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin, Retrieved from: http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2006/68794.htm
Sharma, A. (2007). India and energy security. Asian Affairs 38, 158-172
Sokolski, H. (2008, January 23). Mr. Rudd says no to India on uranium. Far Eastern Economic Review, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/LYa9ca
South Africa urged to block India’s nuclear fuel bid. (2008, August 27). Hindustan Times, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/Og6ZKH
Talbott, S. (2005, July 21). Good day for India, bad for nonproliferation. Yale Global, Retrieved from: http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=6042
Thyagaraj , M. & Raju G.C T. (2006). The U.S.-Indian nuclear agreement: Balancing energy needs and nonproliferation goals. Orbis 50(2), 355-369
Toshiba. (2006, February 6). Toshiba acquires Westinghouse from BNFL. Toshiba Press release, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/omzdwO
United Nations. (1969, May 23). Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties 1969, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/7N9N5m
Uranium to India: A decision to face. (2008, July 24). The Sydney Morning Herald, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/bzBcc2
U.S. Congress 109th. (2006). United States-India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation Act of 2006 (Hyde Act). Report ; 109-721. Washington, D.C: U.S. G.P.O. Retrieved from: http://lccn.loc.gov/2007395742
U.S. Department of State. (2007, August 3). Agreement for cooperation between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of India concerning peaceful uses of nuclear energy (123 Agreement), Retrieved from: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2007/aug/90050.htm
US Embassy in Delhi. Reaching New Heights. US- India Relations in the 21st Century. From: http://goo.gl/lBeWRc
US-India nuclear agreement going through bottleneck (2008, September 2). People’s Daily Online, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/HGp4r9
U.S. needs to make changes in deal: Scientists. (2007, June 18). The Hindu, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/gi1fth
Verma, S. K. (2007). Energy geopolitics and Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline. Energy Policy 35 , Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/fqfqS1
Wable K. M. (2008). The U.S.-India strategic nuclear partnership:A debilitating blow to the non-proliferation regime. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 33(2)
Weiss, L. (2006). Power points: U.S-India nuclear agreement is the wrong deal with the wrong energy source. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 62(3), 21-63.
Weiss, L. U.S.-India nuclear cooperation. Better later than sooner. Non proliferation Review 14(3), 446-457
White House. (2005, July 18). Presidential News and speeches, Retrieved from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/07/20050718-6.htm.
White House Office of Communications. The United States-India Peaceful Atomic Energy Cooperation Act. Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/C3c3N5
White House Office of the Press Secretary. (2004, January 12). Next steps in strategic partnership with India, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/dfs4K6
World Bank. (2008, October 17). Gross domestic product 2007, P:World Development Indicators database, World Bank, Washington: World Bank, Retrieved from: http://goo.gl/g5z3KP
World Bank. World Bank data profile. Country reports. Retrieved from: http://www.worldbank.org/
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2014 Octavio González Segovia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
© Derechos reservados de autor
El material de esta publicación puede ser reproducido sin autorización, siempre y cuando se cite el título, el autor y la fuente institucional.
El contenido publicado en Revista CS se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 Atribución/Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Usted es libre de:
Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material.
Bajo los siguientes términos:
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.