Teaching practices in communicative competence that facilitate the inclusion of children in vulnerable situations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i44.08Keywords:
Inclusive Practices, Communicative Competence, Teaching PracticesAbstract
Classroom diversity, as a space oriented to the full development of its learners requires various inclusive practices that bridge gaps and favor collaborative and respectful work, thus promoting a democratic and dialogic space. This article seeks to describe the communicative teaching practices that favor inclusion in elementary classrooms in Chile, by identifying their effect on the students from the perspective of teachers. To achieve this objective, a two-phase study was carried out: 123 teachers from different regions of Chile participated in the first phase responding to a quantitative instrument; 21 teachers participated in the second phase through a semi-structured interview. The main findings are related to teaching strategies, not very intentional although systematic, but which comply with the diversity, evaluation and self-evaluation components, and also favored the students’ protagonism in their learning process.
Downloads
References
Abós, Pilar; Lorenzo, Juan (2019). Ser maestro en la escuela rural, de la obligación a la opción. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 496, 77-83. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/11162/188584
Alexander, Robin (2019). Whose discourse? Dialogic Pedagogy for a post truth world. Dialogic Pedagogy. An International Online Journal, 7. https://doi.org/10.5195/dpj.2019.268
Anderson, Lorin (2000). Why should reduced class size lead to increased student achievement? En How small classes help teachers do their best (pp. 3–24), editado por Margaret Wang; Jeremy Finn. Philadelphia: Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
Biddle, Bruce; Berliner, David (2002). Small Class Size and Its Effects. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 12-23. Recuperadode: https:/eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ640898
Booth, Tony; Ainscow, Mel (2015). Guía para la educación inclusiva desarrollando el aprendizaje y la participación en los centros escolares. Madrid: OEI/FUHEM.
Buscà, Francesc; Boix, Roser (2020). Competencias profesionales y dimensión territorial para el desempeño de la función docente en la escuela rural: el caso de Cataluña. En Pesquisas e práticas educativas: Desafios e possibilidades no Século XXI (pp. 263-278), editado por Natanael Dos Santos. João Pessoa: UFPB/BC.
Calero, Jorge; Escardíbul, Jorge (2017). Calidad del profesorado en la adquisición de competencias de los alumnos. Un análisis basado en PIRLS 2011. Madrid: Fundación Ramón Areces. Recuperado de https://www.fundacionareces.es/recursos/doc/portal/2018/03/20/mono-calidad-profesoradopdf.pdf
Castillo, Pamela; Gràcia, Marta (2022). Uso y desarrollo de la lengua oral en el aula rural: cambio de paradigmas educativos. Psicoperspectivas, 21(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol21-issue3-fulltext-2689
Clarke, Sherice (2015). The right to speak. En Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (pp. 167-180), editado por Lauren Resnick; Christa Asterhan; Sherice Clarke. Washintong American Educational Research Association.
Coll, César (2016). La personalización del aprendizaje escolar. El qué, por qué y el cómo de un reto insoslayable. En Reptes de l’educació a Catalunya. Anuari d’Educació 2015 (pp. 44-104), coordinado por Josep M. Vilalta. Barcelona: Fundación Jaume Bofill.
Connolly, Marie; Haeck, Catherine (2018). Nonlinear class size effects on cognitive and noncognitive development of young children. Journal of Labor Economics, 40(S1), S341-S382. Recuperado de https://ideas.repec.org/p/grc/wpaper/18-01.html
Cooper, Harris (1989). Does Reducing Student-to-Instructor Ratios Affect Achievement? Educational Psychologist, 24(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2401_3
Creswell, John (2008). Mixed Methods Research: State of the Art. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Díaz-Herrera, Claudio (2018). Investigación cualitativa y análisis de contenido temático: orientación intelectual de revista Universum. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 28(1), 119-142. https://doi.org/10.5209/RGID.60813
Ehrenberg, Ronald; Brewer, Dominic; Gamoran, Adam; Willms, Douglas (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.003
Espinoza, Manuel; Vossoughi, Shirin; Rose, Mike; Poza, Luis E. (2020). Matters of participation: Notes on the study of dignity and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 27(4), 325-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1779304
Esteban-Guitart, Moises (2021). Advancing the funds of identity theory: a critical and unfinished dialogue. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(2), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2021.1913751
Flores, Vasthi; García, Ismael; Romero, Silvia (2017). Prácticas inclusivas en la formación docente en México. Liberabit, 23(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.24265/liberabit.2017.v23n1.03
Giroux, Henry (2015). Pedagogías disruptivas y el desarrollo de la justicia social bajo regímenes neoliberales. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social, 4(2), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.15366/riejs2015.4.2
González, Rodrigo (2018). Segregación educativa en el sistema chileno desde una perspectiva comparada. Ministerio de Educación. Recuperado de https://centroestudios.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/100/2018/03/Cap%C3%ADtulo_-Segregaci%C3%B3n-Educativa-en-el-Sistema-Chileno-desde-una-perspectiva-comparada.pdf
Gràcia, Mara; Galván-Bovaira, María; Sánchez-Cano, Manuel (2017). Análisis de las líneas de investigación y actuación en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje del lenguaje oral en contexto escolar. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 30(1), 188-209. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.30.1.08gra
Gràcia, Marta; Galván-Bovaira, María; Sánchez-Cano, Manuel; Vega, Fátima; Vilaseca, Rosa; Rivero, Magda (2015). Valoración de la enseñanza de la lengua oral: Escala EVALOE. Barcelona Editorial Graó.
Gràcia, Marta; Sánchez-Cano, Manuel (2022). Competencia Comunicativa Oral. Su desarrollo en la escuela inclusiva: evaluación e intervención. Madrid: Giunti.
Guzmán-Simón, Fernando; García-Jiménez, Eduardo (2015). La evaluación de la alfabetización académica. Relieve, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.1.5147
Hattie, John (2008). Processes of integrating, developing, and processing self information. Self-Processes, Learning, and Enabling Human Potential: Dynamic New Approaches, 3, 51-86.
Hattie, John; Yates, Gregory (2013). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London: Routledge.
Hayes, Andrew; Krippendorff, Klaus (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664
Hernández, Roberto; Mendoza, Christian (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Ciudad de México: McGraw Hill Education.
Ing, Marsha; Webb, Noreen; Franke, Megan; Turrou, Angela; Wong, Jacqueline; Shin, Nami; Fernández, Cecilia (2015). Student participation in elementary mathematics classrooms: the missing link between teacher practices and student achievement? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90, 341-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9625-z
Iño, Weimar (2018). Investigación educativa desde un enfoque cualitativo: la historia oral como método. Voces de la Educación, 3(6), 93-110. Recuperado de https://www.revista.vocesdelaeducacion.com.mx/index.php/voces/article/view/123/110
Lehesvuori, Sami (2013). Towards dialogic teaching in science: Challenging classroom realities through teacher education. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research, 9(2), 218. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.768
Lopezosa, Carlos; Codina, Lluis; Freixa, Pere (2022). ATLAS.ti para entrevistas semiestructuradas: guía de uso para un análisis cualitativo eficaz. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/10230/52848
Matusov, Eugene (2018). Mapping dialogic pedagogy: Instrumental and non-instrumental education. En The Cambridge handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 274-301), editado por Alberto Rosa; Jaan Valsiner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Membrive, Antonio; Nieto, Mara; Solari, Mariana (2021). Enseñar a reflexionar: estrategias y experiencias que utilizan la reflexión para promover aprendizajes con sentido. Cuadernos de Pedagogía. Recuperado de https://www.cuadernosdepedagogia.com/Content/Documento.aspx?params=H4sIAAAAAAAEAMtMSbF1CTEAAmMjcwNLU7Wy1KLiz-Pw8WyMDI0MDU0NLtbz8lNQQF2fb0ryU1LTMvNQUkJLMtEqX_OSQyoJU27TEnOJUtdSk_PxsFJPiYSYAAGZqiGNjAAAAWKE
Menzies, Victoria; Raine, S. (2016). A Large Scale RCT of the ICCAMS Maths Intervention. The Successful Recruiting of 109 Secondary Schools. 11th Annual Conference of Randomised Controlled Trials in the Social Sciences.
Mercer, Neil; Hennessy, Sara; Warwick, Paul (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
Miles, Matthew; Huberman, Michael; Saldaña, Johnny (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. California Sage.
Millard, Will; Menzies, Loic (2016). The State of Speaking in our Schools. Recuperado de https://cfey.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Oracy-Report-Final.pdf
Ministerio de Educación de Chile (2018). Agencia de Calidad de la Educación. Los desafíos para la nueva educación rural. Recuperado de http://www.agenciaeducación.cl/noticias/los-desafios-la-nueva-educacion-rural/
Molinari, Luisa; Mameli, Consuelo (2013). Process quality of classroom discourse: Pupil participation and learning opportunities. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.05.003
Moluayonge, Gracemary; Park, In-woo (2017). Effect of Challenges with Class Size, Classroom Management and Availability of Instructional Resources on Science Teachers Teaching Practices in Secondary Schools. Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2017.41.1.135
Ocampo, Aldo (2016). Aproximaciones y descripciones generales sobre el objeto de la educación inclusiva. En Cuadernos de Educación Inclusiva. Vol. 1. Los rumbos de la educación inclusiva en el siglo XXI. La necesidad de modernizar el enfoque (pp. 24-89), coordinado por Aldo Ocampo. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5578424
Orozco, Inmaculada; Moriña, Anabel (2019). Prácticas docentes para una pedagogía inclusiva en educación primaria: escuchando las voces del profesorado. Aula Abierta, 48(3), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.48.3.2019.331-338
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico - OCDE (2018). Estudios Económicos de la OCDE: Chile 2018. OECD Economic Surveys: Chile 2018, 18(S2), 48. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/economy/surveys/Chile-2018-OECD-economic-sruvey-Spanish.pdf
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico - OCDE (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris OECD Publishing. Recuperado de https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2019_f8d7880d-en
Oscarson, Mats (2014). Self-Assessment in the Classroom. The Companion to Language Assessment, 2, 712-729. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla046
Paulhus, Delroy (2002). Socially Desirable Responding: The Evolution of a Construct. En The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49-69), editado por Henry I. Braun; Douglas N. Jackson; David E. Wiley. Nueva York: Erlbaum.
Peirano, Claudia; Puni, Swapna; Astorga, María (2015). Educación rural: oportunidades para la innovación. Cuadernos de Investigación Educativa, 6(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.18861/cied.2015.6.1.7
Piza, Narcisa; Amaiquema, Francisco; Beltrán, Gina (2019). Métodos y técnicas en la investigación cualitativa: algunas precisiones necesarias. Revista Conrado, 15(70), 455-459. Recuperado de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1990-86442019000500455
Prado, Dirkha; Díaz, Nicole; Vásquez, Carla (2018). Importancia de la formación inicial docente como facilitador de prácticas inclusivas en Educación. Polyphōnía. Revista de Educación Inclusiva / Polyphōnía. Journal of Inclusive Education, 2(2), 141-174. Recuperado de https://www.aacademica.org/polyphnia.revista.de.educacion.inclusiva/34
Redding, Sam (2016). Competencies and Personalized Learning. En Handbook on Personalized Learning for States, Districts, and Schools (pp. 3-36), editado por Marilyn Murphy; Sam Redding; Janet S. Twyman. Filadelfia: Temple University. Recuperado de https://compcenternetwork.org/sites/default/files/archive/Redding_chapter_web.pdf
Reznitskaya, Alina (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 446-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01066
Riba, Carles (2009). Mètodes d´investigació qualitativa. Barcelona: FUOC.
Rodríguez, Yndira (2020). Reflexiones del uso de ATLAS.ti en el análisis de información cualitativa: indagando sensibilidades. Revista Ciencias de la Educación, 30(56), 708-726. Recuperado de http://servicio.bc.uc.edu.ve/educacion/revista/index.htm
Sedlacek, Martin; Sedova, Klara (2017). How many are talking? The role of collectivity in dialogic teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 85, 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.001
Sedova, Klara; Navrátilová, Jana (2020). Silent students and the patterns of their participation in classroom talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29, 681-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1794878
Sedova, Klara; Sedlacek, Martín; Svaricek, Roman (2016). Teacher professional development as a means of transforming student classroom talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.005
Sfard, Anna (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shen, Ting; Konstantopoulos, Spyros (2017). Class size effects on reading achievement in Europe: Evidence from PIRLS. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 98-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.04.001
Subero, David; Vujasinovic, Ellen; Esteban-Guitart, Moises (2017). Mobilising funds of identity in and out of school. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(2), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1148116
Tahull, Joan; Montero, Iolanda (2018). Reflexiones sobre la escuela rural: un modelo educativo de éxito. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 32, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.15366/tp2018.32.012
Tao, Yang; Chen, Gaowei (2023). Coding schemes and analytic indicators for dialogic teaching: A systematic review of the literature. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 39, 100702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100702
Taylor, Steve; Bogdan, Robert (1987). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. La búsqueda de significados. Barcelona: Paidós.
Tigse, Cristian (2019). El constructivismo, según bases teóricas de César Coll. Revista Andina de Educación, 2(1), 25-28. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2019.2.1.4
Vera-Bachmann, Daniela; Salvo, Sonia (2016). Perfiles de escuelas rurales exitosas: una propuesta de la psicología educacional ante el cierre de escuelas. Universitas Psychologica, 15(2), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy15-2.perep
Vrikki, Maria; Wheatley, Lisa; Howe, Christine; Hennessy, Sara; Mercer, Neil (2019). Dialogic practices in primary school classrooms. Language and Education, 33(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1509988
Willig, Carla (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Nueva York: McGraw Hill.
Zipin, Lew; Brennan, Marie (2021). Ethical vexations that hang “knowledge questions” for curriculum. En Curriculum challenges and opportunties in a changing world. Transnational perspectives in curriculum inquiry (pp. 173- 193), editado por Bill Green; Philip Roberts; Marie Brennan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61667-0_11
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pamela Soledad Castillo-Mardones, Katherine Villalobos-Muñoz, Marta Gràcia-Garcia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© Reserved Copyright
Material in this publication may be reproduced without authorization, provided the title, author and institutional source is acknowledged.
The content published in Revista CS is distributed under the Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 Attribution/Recognition-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
How to Cite
