China-CEE Relations in a New Era: The Drivers behind the Development of the Platform for Regional Cooperation 16+1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i37.5227Palavras-chave:
16+1 Framework, China-CEE Relations, Historical Memory, Whole-Of-Region Diplomacy, Regional CooperationResumo
Relations between China and the countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) experienced a rapid and profound deepening from 2009 to 2019, with the 16+1 regional platform for cooperation playing a central role. From the Chinese side, what are the motivations behind the establishment of 16+1? Through a literature review, the article identifies three sets of drivers: pragmatic, political, and historical. The increasing priority given by China to relations with the European Union is also leading to a shift in how the country understands and interacts with CEE, resulting in the Europeanization of 16+1.
Downloads
Referências
American Enterprise Institute (2022). China Global Investment Tracker. Recovered from https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/
Benner, Thorsten; Gaspers, Jan; Ohlberg, Mareike; Poggetti, Lucrezia; Shi-Kupfer, Kristin (2018). Authoritarian Advance: Responding to China’s Growing Political Influence in Europe. Merics. Recovered from https://merics.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/GPPi_MERICS_Authoritarian_Advance_2018_1.pdf
Calic, Marie-Janine (2019). A History of Yugoslavia. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Callahan, William A. (2011). China: The Pessoptimist Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.
De Castro, Tereza; Vlčková, Jana; Hnát, Pavel (2017). Trade and Investment Relations between the Czech Republic and China: The Czech Republic as a Gateway to the EU? Society and Economy-Budapest, 39(4), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2017.39.4.2
Éltető, Andrea; Szunomár, Ágnes (2016). Chinese Investment and Trade: Strengthening Ties with Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 24-48. https://doi.org/10.20472/BM.2016.4.1.002
European Commission (2019). EU-China – A Strategic Outlook. Recovered from https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/communication-eu-china-a-strategic-outlook.pdf
European Trade Union Confederation (2017). Revealed: True Size of EU East-West Pay Gap. Recovered from https://www.etuc.org/en/pressrelease/revealed-true-size-eu-east-west-pay-gap
Fürst, Rudolf; Tesař, Filip (Eds.) (2014). China’s Comeback in Former Eastern Europe: No Longer Comrades, Not Yet Strategic Partners. Praha: Institute of International Relations. Recovered from https://www.dokumenty-iir.cz/Knihy/Furst-Tesar_Chinas_comeback.pdf
Garlick, Jeremy (2019). China’s Economic Diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe: A Case of Offensive Mercantilism? Europe-Asia Studies, 71(8), 1390-1414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1648764
Garver, John W. (2012). China’s Quest: The History of the Foreign Relations of the People’s Republic of China. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gaspers, Jan (2018). Divide and Rule. Berlin Policy Journal. Recovered from https://berlinpolicyjournal.com/divide-and-rule/
Golonka, Marta (2012). Partners or Rivals? Chinese Investments in Central and Eastern Europe. Warszawa: Central & Eastern European Development Institute.
Henderson, Karen (Ed.) (1999). Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union. London: UCL Press.
Holslag, Jonathan (2017). How China’s New Silk Road Threatens European Trade. The International Spectator, 52(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2017.1261517
Jakóbowski, Jakub (2018). Chinese-led Regional Multilateralism in Central and Eastern Europe, Africa and Latin America: 16 + 1, FOCAC, and CCF. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(113), 659-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1458055
Jakóbowski, Jakub; Seroka, Mateusz (2019). The Dubrovnik summit: the Europeanisation and enlargement of the 16+1 format [Analyses]. Center for Eastern Studies. Recovered from https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2019-04-17/dubrovnik-summit-europeanisation-and-enlargement-161-format
Kong, Tianping (2015). 16+1 Cooperation Framework: Genesis, Characteristics and Prospect. Medjunarodni Problemi, 67(2-3), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1503167T
Lüthi, Lorenz M. (2015). China and East Europe, 1956-1960. Modern China Studies, 22(1), 233257. Recovered from https://www.proquest.com/docview/1618193303
Matura, Tamas (2019). China–CEE Trade, Investment and Politics. Europe-Asia Studies, 71(3), 388-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1571166
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China (2003). China’s EU Policy Paper. Recovered from https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjb_663304/zzjg_663340/xos_664404/dqzzywt_664812/200310/t20031013_572356.html
Observatory of Economic Complexity (2022). China Historical Data. Recovered from https://oec.world/en/profile/country/chn
Przychodniak, Marcin (2018). The “EU effect”: How European Union Influences State’s Involvement in the “16+1” China - Central and Eastern European Countries (China-CEEC) Initiative. In 16+1 Cooperation and China-EU Relationship (pp. 161-182), edited by Chen Xin; He Zhigao. Budapest: China-CEE Institute. Recovered from https://china-cee.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/161-cooperation.pdf
Salát, Gergely (2020). An Authoritarian Advance or Creating Room for Manoeuvre? The Case of Hungary’s China Policy. Stosunki Międznarodowe, 56(2), 125-143. Recovered from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=955654
Scott, David (2018). China and the Baltic States: Strategic Challenges and Security Dilemmas for Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Journal on Baltic Security, 4(1), 25-37. Recovered from https://sciendo.com/abstract/journals/jobs/4/1/article-p25.xml
Simurina, Jurica (2014). China’s Approach to the CEE-16 [Short Term Policy Brief 85]. Europe China Research and Advice Network. Recovered from http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/china/docs/division_ecran/ecran_is107_paper_85_chinas_approach_to_the_cee-16_jurica_simurina_en.pdf
Slobodník, Matin (2015). Socialist Anti-Orientalism: Perceptions of China in Czechoslovak Travelogues from the 1950s. In Postcolonial Europe? Essays on Post-Communist Literatures and Cultures (pp. 299-314), edited by Dobrota Pucherova; Robert Gafrik. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004303850_017
Spence, Jonathan (1990). The Search for Modern China. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Šteinbuka, Inna; Bērziņa-Čerenkova, Una Aleksandra; Sprūds, Andris (2019). ‘Going Global’ and Regionalization in EU-China Relationship: Perspective from the Baltics. European Studies, 6(1), 177-192. Recovered from https://caes.upol.cz/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/STEINBUKA.pdf
Szczudlik-Tatar, Justyna (2010). Central and Eastern Europe in China’s Foreign Policy After the Last EU’s Enlargement. In Panorama of Global Security Environment 2010 (pp. 349-363), edited by Marian Majer; Róbert Ondrejcsák; Vladimír Tarasovič; Tomáš Valášek. Bratislava: CENAA.
Szent-Iványi, Balázs (Ed.) (2017). Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Post-Crisis Perspectives. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Recovered from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-40496-7.pdf
Szunomár, Ágnes (2018). One Belt, One Road: Connecting China with Central and Eastern Europe? In The Belt & Road Initiative in the Global Arena (pp. 71-85), edited by Yu Cheng; Lilei Song; Lihe Huang. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5921-6_5
Turcsányi, Richard (2014). Central and Eastern Europe’s Courtship with China: Trojan Horse within the EU? Brussels: European Institute for Asian Studies. Recovered from https://www.eias.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/EU-Asia-at-a-glance-Richard-Turcsanyi-China-CEE.pdf
Turcsányi, Richard (2020). China and the Frustrated Region: Central and Eastern Europe’s Repeating Troubles with Great Powers. China Report, 56(1), 60-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009445519895626
Turcsányi, Richard; Qiaoan, Runya (2019). Friends or Foes? How Diverging Views of Communist Past Undermine the China-CEE ‘16+1 Platform’. Asia Europe Journal, 18, 397-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00550-6
Turcsányi, Richard; Qiaoan, Runya; Kříž, Zdenek (2014). Coming from Nowhere: The Chinese Perception of the Concept of Central Europe. In The Quandaries of China’s Domestic and Foreign Development (pp. 155-171), edited by Dominik Mierzejewski. Lodz: Lodz University Press.
Vangeli, Anastas (2018). Global China and Symbolic Power: The Case of 16 + 1 Cooperation. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(113), 674-687. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1458056
World Bank (2022a). GDP (constant 2015 US$) [Data file]. Recovered from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD
World Bank (2022b). Population, total [Data file]. Recovered from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL
Xinhua (2011, June 6). Full Text of Wen’s Speech at Economic Forum. China Daily. Recovered from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011weneurope/2011-06/26/content_12777268.htm
Xinhua (2018a, July 8). Chinese Premier Urges Pragmatic Cooperation for Common Prosperity. China.org. Recovered from http://www.china.org.cn/world/2018-07/08/content_55561929.htm
Xinhua (2018b, December 18). Full Text of China’s Policy Paper on the European Union. China Daily. Recovered from https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201812/18/WS5c1897a0a3107d4c3a001758.html
Xinhua (2019, April 13). Full Text of the Dubrovnik Guidelines for Cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European Countries. China.org. Recovered from http://www.china.org.cn/world/Off_the_Wire/2019-04/13/content_74677639.htm
Zhang, Chun (2019). China’s Whole-of-Region Diplomacy Revisited: Past Experience and Future Prospects. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 5(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740019500039
Zubok, Vladislav (2017). The Soviet Union and China in the 1980s: Reconciliation and Divorce. Cold War History, 17(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2017.1315923
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 David Mauricio Castrillón-Kerrigan
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© Direitos autorais reservados
O material desta publicação pode ser reproduzido sem autorização, desde que o título, o autor e a fonte institucional sejam citados.
O conteúdo publicado na Revista CS é distribuído sob a licença Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 Attribution/Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.
Você tem o direito de:
Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato.
Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material.
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado , prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas . Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
NãoComercial — Você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais.
Como Citar
